New: a reviewer-facing claim map for Papers I & II
There is now a Claim map on the papers page: a single page that states, claim by claim, what the series proves and what it only conjectures.
Every claim from Paper I and Paper II carries two labels — a plain-language status (Proven / Conjectured / Disconfirmed) and its native audit tag (PASS / PART / STUB / FAIL) — so a reviewer can see at a glance where a result is a theorem or a no-free-parameter experiment, where the mechanism is shown but closure is pending, where a prediction is structured but untested, and — just as important — where something was tested and not recovered (chirality and CP at the discrete level, Paper II FAIL).
The page is deliberately honest about its own limits. It does not replace the audit tables in the paper repositories; where the two disagree, the paper’s table is authoritative. And it makes the negative space explicit — a “What these papers do not claim” section — in keeping with the site’s Statement of Intent: the program charts the expressive power of the A=1 lattice, not an ontological claim about reality. “Proven” means proven about the object, not about nature.
Paper III — Tidal Ionization and the Quantum Roche Limit has a placeholder section already; its rows will be mapped at first Zenodo deposit.
Pointers:
- The map: Claim map
- Papers: Paper I · Paper II
- Framing: Statement of Intent