Bio

Jack D. Menendez — principal investigator of the A=1 Discrete Causal Lattice research program.

I choose to explore mathematics and physics. Not because they are easy or hard, but because I am curious.

Jack D. Menendez. I lead the A=1 Discrete Causal Lattice (DCL) program — a substrate-first effort to derive spacetime, the Standard Model gauge group, and gravity from a single conservation law on a discrete causal lattice. I am the author of Papers I and II in the series and the maintainer of dcl-core and the series-wide framework.

I have a bachelor’s in mathematics from San José State University. I built the first network-protocol tunneling software — SNA through Hyperchannel, later SNA through OSI, and finally SNA through TCP/IP. I built the first NAT software and the first large-scale website load balancer, work that produced four patents naming me as one of three inventors. I have been a manager at the director level in software development, and I have a deep understanding of how businesses work across several industries.

I have close to forty years of experience in software development, with a focus on system design, architecture, and implementation. Over the years, I’ve built systems from sparse requirements in large domains, even global domains. So when I think about physics, I naturally think about how I can build a system that allows physics to emerge.

The secret to building any system with sparse requirements is to start with the simplest abstraction possible that has the most degrees of freedom for emergence. For the DCL program, that abstraction is a discrete causal lattice with a single conservation law. The DCL program is an effort to learn what physics can emerge from that simple abstraction.

For me, this project is a way to express my creativity and curiosity. At the very least, my methodology is something that others can learn from and apply to their own projects. The idea that such a simple, basic design can give rise to the rich physics we see in our universe is fascinating to me. I could not do this without the physics that has come before, because it provides a perspective that I can measure and falsify against.

I work in the open, by necessity as much as conviction. I am not part of an institution, so everything — the papers, the code, the experiments, and the audit tables that mark each claim as proven or merely conjectured — is public, and that openness is what preserves the work independent of me or any affiliation. It is also my only real channel for feedback: an independent researcher has no department down the hall, so working in the open is how the work earns scrutiny, critique, and falsification. Whether any of it has lasting value to physics is not mine to decide — that verdict belongs to the physics community, and it would be the icing, not the cake. The cake is the methodology itself, set out openly so that others can check it, build on it, and one day take part.

I am not trying to prove that the DCL program is correct, but rather to explore what it can do and to share that exploration with others. I hope that others will find this interesting and be inspired to explore it further, whether that means building on it, finding flaws in it, or using it as a springboard for their own ideas. The ultimate meaning of the DCL program is for others to decide.

Find me

For review, endorsement, collaboration, or press, see the contact page.